Saturday, October 24, 2015

Trekking the Edwards DNA Trail Back to Madagascar


More definitive conclusions can be drawn when multiple people from one family take an autosomal DNA test, such as 23andMe, and chromosome segments can be analyzed, compared, and triangulated. Currently, in 23andMe, that is possible only if test takers are taking time to accept requests to share genomes from their DNA matches. This is very important. Collaborative cooperation can lead to great findings. Shortly, 23andMe will be making major changes to their system, allowing easier genome-sharing between DNA matches. I am hoping for drastic improvements, so we will see. Read about 23andMe pending changes from DNA expert Shannon Christmas’ blog HERE.

When I received my maternal uncle John Reed's 23andMe results on April 4, 2015, I immediately looked at his ancestry composition. To my surprise, over 80% of his X chromosome was of Native American descent. I have since figured out that my uncle received nearly all of his X-DNA from his maternal grandmother, Mary Danner Davis (1867-1932). I also noticed that his ancestry composition included 0.5% South Asian DNA. At first, I contributed that to him having Native American ancestry since certain forms of Asian DNA have been linked to Native Americans. My theory turned out to be inaccurate. I have since discovered that he inherited his South Asian DNA from his father, my maternal grandfather, Simpson Reed (1881-1955).

My Uncle’s 23andMe Ancestry Composition

Fast forward to two months later. In June, I finally identified the father of Granddaddy Simpson Reed’s mother Sarah Partee Reed; she was born into slavery around 1852 on Squire Boone Partee's plantation in Panola County (Como), Mississippi.  DNA matches, oral history, and genealogy research finally pinpointed Prince Edwards (born c. 1830) as Grandma Sarah's father. Read more about that discovery HERE. Grandpa Prince had been enslaved by William Edwards Sr., who was Squire Partee's father-in-law and neighbor. Along with that discovery was the DNA confirmation of a brother of Prince named Peter Edwards (born c. 1835). Uncle Peter and his 12 children settled in Oklahoma by 1910. This DNA discovery enticed more of Uncle Peter's descendants to take the 23andMe test. Collectively, our DNA results are revealing some interesting things about our family history.

Presently, four descendants of Uncle Peter Edwards have taken the 23andMe test. Three have taken the AncestryDNA test. Three other descendants of Uncle Peter recently ordered 23andMe kits! My mother and I, her brother and sister, their paternal first cousin, and three second cousins make up the eight descendants of Grandpa Prince Edwards who have tested with 23andMe thus far. Comparing our DNA in 23andMe with the four currently tested descendants of Uncle Peter has revealed that my uncle inherited that South Asian DNA from his great-grandfather, Prince Edwards!

Being direct evidence, three matching chromosome segments between Uncle Peter’s great-grandson Brian Edwards and three of Grandpa Prince’s descendants were on sections where South Asian DNA exists. In other words, Cousin Brian matches my uncle John Reed on chromosome 2, from point 209 to 216 Mbp (6.3 cM). Both have South Asian DNA in this section of their chromosome 2. Cousin Brian matches my mother’s paternal first cousin Armintha on chromosome 7, from point 3 to 20 Mbp (30.7 cM). They both have South Asian DNA in this section of their chromosome 7. Also, Cousin Brian matches my mother and her sister on chromosome 10, from point 122 to 127 Mbp (11.5 cM). All three of them possess South Asian DNA in this section of their chromosome 10. This clearly indicates that they all inherited their South Asian DNA from a common ancestor – one of the parents of Prince and Peter. Additionally, all descendants, except two, had South Asian DNA, from 0.1 to 1.8%. I also noticed something else of great significance. All of us, except my uncle, also had Southeast Asian DNA, ranging from 0.1 to 1.1%. Interestingly, GEDmatch’s Dodecad V3 Admixture Proportions tool shows higher Asian percentages for each of us.

Uncle Peter Edwards’ great-grandson Brian shares a matching chromosome segment in his yellow region (South Asian) of Chromosome 2 with my uncle, who is a great-grandson of Grandpa Prince Edwards.

To be sure of the commonality of having South Asian DNA, I looked at the ancestry compositions of many of my other 23andMe DNA matches of African descent. A small percentage of people possess South Asian DNA. Therefore, having this DNA reflected something. What was it? Did we have an ancestor from India or Pakistan? Or was this South Asian DNA an indicator of something else? On my father’s side, I had already become aware that ancestors from Madagascar, an island located 250 miles off the southeastern African coast of Mozambique in the Indian Ocean, may transfer Southeast Asian DNA to their descendants. What about South Asian DNA?

T.L. Dixon, a DNA scholar in the Malagasy Roots Project Facebook group, confirmed that South Asian DNA may be an indicator of a Madagascar ancestor. He further stated, “The range seems to be from 0% to 25%, based on my family's Malagasy ancestors….You should also note the Southeast Asian clusters very closely to South Asian (India subcontinent), so the algorithm may show percentages in both categories.” Another DNA scholar, Teresa Vega, who has also extensively researched her Madagascar ancestry, also explained that she has both Southeast Asian and South Asian admixtures in her ancestry composition. Her extensive research can be read HERE.

The ancestry composition of a Malagasy shows 22.2% South Asian DNA
and 20.5% Southeast Asian DNA
(Courtesy of TL Dixon)

Of the approximately 450,000 enslaved Africans who were transported to America over the course of the transatlantic slave trade, only about 4,800 of them were from Madagascar. That is way less than 1%. They were transported via 17 documented slave voyages into New York and Virginia from Madagascar. Of that total, from 1719 to 1725, around 1,400 enslaved Africans from Madagascar were disembarked into Virginia through the Rappahannock and York River ports. Additionally, more were transported to the Caribbean, especially Jamaica and Barbados. In Exchanging Our Country Mark, Michael Gomez describes how those particular Africans transported into Virginia were "yellowish" in complexion and had hair like a "Madagascar's" (p. 41). Madagascar’s inhabitants are called the Malagasy people, and they speak a language by that name. Sources note that many of the Malagasy people possessed light skin and facial features very akin to people in Southeast Asia and Indonesia. Many others possessed darker skin and curly hair. Geneticists have determined that all of the Malagasy people descend from ancestors from Africa, as well as from Asia, specifically Borneo (Source). As time passed in America, Malagasy Africans were often and mistakenly labeled as “Indians,” or “Black Indians” or even “Native Americans.” Some may have even become labeled as “Blackfoot Indians.”

Interestingly, my great-grandmother Sarah was rumored as having Native American ancestry. Even one of her sons possessed “cold black,” curly hair that many considered to be a Native American trait. Turns out, that was most probably a Malagasy trait, not the Cherokee Nation. As demonstrated here, Grandma Sarah’s Madagascar roots came from her father, Grandpa Prince Edwards. Oral history revealed that his father was likely an African named Luke Edwards (born c. 1790), who was transported to Virginia from Africa, and eventually taken to Panola County, Mississippi. Oral history collected by my cousin Jeffrey O. Green Ogbar also relayed that Luke’s African name was written down in family records as “Ogba(r) Ogumba.” The name itself suggests Ghana or Nigeria origins, and past DNA testing earmarked Ghana as his origins. Further Y-DNA testing (67 markers) may confirm his origins soon. Therefore, this Madagascar ancestry likely came from Grandpa Prince & Uncle Peter Edwards’ mother. Her name, identity, and actual birthplace in Georgia are currently being confirmed. Stay tuned.

Malagasy Women in Madagascar

Slave Ancestral Research: Unearthing your Family’s Past Before the 1870 Census

The Black Caucus of the American Library Association (BCALA) published this second article in their latest newsletter, BCALA News, Summer 2015, Volume 42 Issue 3, pp 41-46. I am reposting it here on my blog. This article can also be read at the following link:

You have thoroughly researched your African-American roots all the way back to the 1870 U.S. census. You have even read an article, book, or two about the institution of chattel slavery here in America. Now you are wondering what to do? How can you trace your family history back into the slavery era? How do you find and document your enslaved ancestors? Part two of this genealogy series answers these questions.

First and foremost, you must determine if your African-American ancestors were enslaved. Elderly relatives may be able to shed some light. You can also determine if your ancestors were free or enslaved by researching the 1860 U.S. census. If you find your ancestors in the 1860 U.S. census, residing in a slave state, then your ancestors were “Free People of Color” (FPOC).  Only a small percentage of African-American families, especially in the South, were actually free before the Civil War. Historians have estimated that more than 200,000 FPOC were in the South and in the North before the Civil War. However, most people of African descent here in America were enslaved, especially in the South. More than 4,000,000 were enslaved in the South when the Civil War began in 1861.

If you have successfully located your ancestors in the U.S. census records, all the way back to the 1870 U.S. census, then you have successfully reached the point known in the genealogy world as the “1870 Brick Wall.” If your ancestors were enslaved during and before the Civil War, there is only one way to knock down this infamous brick wall. You must find the name of the last slave-owner to research for information about your enslaved ancestors. This is imperative. Slave ancestral research cannot be conducted without knowing the name of the last slave-owner.

During the early years of my genealogical journey that began in 1993, I presumed that the surnames of nearly all African Americans came from the last slave-owner. While researching my family roots, I found that to not be true.  Some former slaves took the last slave-owner's surname, but a lot of them did not.  Many emancipated people not only chose different surnames after slavery, but many people had surnames on farms and plantations that were concealed from most slave-owners. In The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom, 1750-1925, historian Herbert Gutman quoted the following from the 1865 diary of Eliza Frances Andrews, a slave-owner’s daughter in Georgia, “I notice that the negroes seldom or never take the names of the present owners in adopting their ‘entitles’ as they call their own surnames, but always that of some former master, and they go back as far as possible.” (pg. 256), the genealogy website maintained by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, reports that only 15 percent of former slaves retained the last slave-owner’s surname. The statistics vary on this subject. However, the general consensus, based on a number of sources, indicates that the number of people who did not take the last slave-owner’s surname is greater than the number of people who did.

Here are seven other important facts to remember when starting your quest to document your enslaved ancestors:

1. Slavery ended in 1865, in most areas of the South.
2. Husbands and wives were not always enslaved on the same farm or plantation.
3. A number of African Americans and their families were enslaved by the same family for several generations.
4. Many enslaved people had multiple owners.
5. Some African Americans chose surnames not affiliated with any slave-owner.
6. Slave-owners acquired slaves through the following sources:
a. Estate sales
b. Public Auction, Slave markets, or independent sellers
c. Sheriff sales
d. Inheritance from family members (fathers, fathers-in-law, uncles, grandfathers, etc.)
7. If one of your enslaved ancestors was “mulatto,” and you have no oral history about this ancestor’s parentage, don’t immediately conclude that the slave-owner was the father.

With genealogy, especially slave ancestral research, one is often faced with direct evidence vs. indirect evidence. Evidence only arises when the researcher asks a specific question and then considers whether the information found in a particular record answers that question. Direct evidence is information that directly answers a question, such as ‘what year was Prince born,’ without a need for other evidence to explain or interpret it. Conversely, indirect evidence is circumstantial information that requires additional evidence to devise a reliable conclusion. Of course, direct evidence usually carries more weight than indirect evidence. However, with slave ancestral research, many forms of direct evidence that emphatically proves family relationships, birthplaces, and other happenings are often non-existent because slaves were merely considered “property” and not human beings. Indeed, a number of researchers have been very fortunate to find pieces of direct evidence, in the form of old family letters, diaries, ledgers, Bibles, etc.

With this background information, here are seven basic steps to begin your slave ancestral research journey.

Step 1 – Talk with your kin again.

To begin the journey of finding and documenting enslaved ancestors, you should talk to elderly family members again. I say “again” because you should have already conversed with family elders during the beginning stages of your genealogy research. Record their memories of past family members, especially the ones who lived during slavery. Inquire if the family’s surname has always been used by the family, or if at one time, the surname was said to have been different. If so, record that surname because it will likely serve as a great clue in your quest to find and document your enslaved ancestors. Record any special stories that were passed down in the family, especially if the events happened during slavery. Verify where the family resided during and after slavery. Chances are good that your ancestors remained close to the farm or plantation where they had been enslaved. Note the names of other family members or kinship with other families with other surnames. Those surnames may also serve as great clues. 

Step 2 – Study the Neighborhood.

Once you have found your ancestors in the 1870 U.S. census, go back and study the neighborhood. Look at the white families who lived near your ancestors for suspects. I often advise people to scroll at least the first ten pages before and after your family in that census. As mentioned in the first article, many African Americans on the same 1870 U.S. census pages had likely lived together earlier as a family group on their former enslavers’ farms and plantations. As late as 1870 and further, they continued to depend upon these relationships, even though some people were not blood-related. In 1870, you may often run across other families in the area with the same last names as your ancestors. Some of them may have been blood relatives, and some were not. Elder family members may know which families were blood-related. More importantly, the goal is to also find any white persons who may have been the last slave-owner. Your examination of the neighborhood for clues is a methodology called cluster genealogy. Becoming familiar with the 1870 neighborhood, i.e., family, friends, and associates, just five years after slavery, often reveals great clues to determining who the last slave-owner may have been. Additionally, increase your knowledge about the area and county where they resided through published sources.

Step 3 – Research the 1850 and 1850 Censuses/Slave Schedules.

Armed with clues gained from conducting cluster genealogy, research the 1850 and 1860 slave schedules for the county where your ancestors were living in 1870, to see if any suspected persons owned slaves. Highly suspected persons are whites with the same surname that your ancestors chose to retain, since many people chose to keep the last slave-owner’s surname. However, there is one problem with slave schedules. Outside of identifying the names of potential slave-owners, many researchers feel that the 1850 and 1860 slave schedules are fundamentally useless. Why? When slave schedules were added to the U.S. federal census in 1850 and 1860, census enumerators were not required to list each enslaved person by name.  The name of the slave-owner was reported, with only a scanty description of each slave – age, sex, and color. Enslaved people, age 100 and over, were supposed to be named in the 1860 slave schedules, but only some of them had their names recorded. Despite this inhumane act of not reporting our enslaved ancestors’ names, the slave schedules can provide a plethora of clues. Compare the age, sex, and color of the slaves to that of your ancestors. Also, research the 1850 and 1860 census records to see if there were any white families with the same last names.  Some people were omitted in the slave schedules.

Step 4 – Research the Suspected Slave-owner’s Family.

You may have to do as much (or more) research on the last slave-owner and his family in order to find your enslaved ancestors. Note the following key facts about the suspected slave-owning family.

1. Pay attention to migration patterns. Note the birthplaces of the possible slave-owners to see if they match the birthplaces of your ancestors.
2. Gather the following information on the slave-owner. 
A. Year and place of death 
B.  Maiden name of wife 
C.  Birthplace
D.  Children’s names and the names of sons-in-law
E.  Parents’ names and their dates and places of death.
3. Scour the Internet for others who are researching the same family, i.e. genealogy message boards and family trees on
4. Read county history books to see if there are any written histories on the slave-owning families. 
5. If a possible female slave-owner was found in the censuses and slave schedules, she was likely a widow and her husband may have been the previous slave-owner. Research to determine the name of her deceased husband and his date and place of death.
6. Check the historical society in the county where your ancestors were enslaved or the State Archives to see if any plantation records may exist for that suspected slave-holding family.

Step 5 – Research County Court Records.

Enslaved African Americans were considered “property,” like horses, cattle, furniture, etc. Many of the enslaved were recorded in court records by their first names for any transactions that affected their ownership.  Wills, probate and estate records are the most valuable resources in tracing enslaved ancestors. They often contain the names of slaves frequently listed in the wills and estate inventories. Once you have found the name of a suspected slave-owner, check to see if he left a will. Also, search for his probate and estate records.  When a person died leaving a will, he died testate; his estate was distributed according to his will. These distributions were recorded in the estate records. When a person died without leaving a will, he died intestate. However, his property was distributed according to the inheritance laws of the State. A court-appointed administrator was responsible for taking a complete inventory of the estate. If the person died testate or intestate before 1865, and he was the owner of slaves, his court records should include the names of his slaves, as well their ages and/or value.

Other rich resources in county court records include the following:

1. Probate/Estate Records, Slave Inventories and Appraisements — when slave-owners died, their estates had to be settled. Slaves were often named in inventories and appraisements of the estate.
2. Deed Records — Bills of sale, deeds of gifts, and deeds of trust show the transference of slaves. 
3. Civil Court Cases — Research these records to see if the slave-owner was involved in any lawsuits that may have involved the slaves.
4. Tax Records – some counties’ tax records may list slaves and their monetary value.

These records can be found at the courthouse in the county where the person died. Most state archive departments have these records on microfilm. Also, microfilms containing wills and estate records can be ordered through your local or nearest Family History Center. Many county court records may also be found online, on sites like,,,, and others. Specifically, and are continuously digitizing more of these records and adding them to their online accessible databases.

Step 6 – Research Other Sources to Determine or Verify the Last Slave-owner.

1. Civil War Pension Records – see
2. Freedman’s Bank Applications – see or
3. Freedmen’s Bureau Records – see
3. Southern Claims Commission Records – see or
4. Slave Narratives
5. Church Records
6. Inquire about unique records for your state at your State Archives.
7. Donated family papers – check your local archives, your state archives, and your local historical society.

Step 7 – Read slave ancestral research case studies and genealogy blogs, books, articles, etc.

Although I have placed this as the last step, it can actually be one of the first steps. Slave ancestral research is not an exact science or does not entail a straightforward methodology, even though I list seven methodical steps in this article. Many people have found and documented their enslaved ancestors in a number of ways, utilizing a lot of records. You can garner much insight by reading cases on how enslaved ancestors were found. My two books, Mississippi to Africa: A Journey of Discovery and 150 Years Later: Broken Ties Mended, offer two extensive case studies on how my families were traced back well into the slavery-era. One of the purposes for writing these books was to provide readers with solid examples of slave ancestral research. Also, my blog, Roots Revealed, contain many posts on how enslaved ancestors were documented. See Genealogist Robyn Smith’s new book, The Best of Reclaiming Kin: A Genealogy Blog, offer great cases as well.

Additionally, several instructional books are available that outline methodologies for slave ancestral research. Those books include the following:

1.     Finding a Place Called Home by Dee Palmer Woodtor
2.     A Genealogist’s Guide to Discovering Your African-American Ancestors by Franklin Smith and Emily Croom

Slave ancestral research is not easy. It requires time, money, patience, and knowing what resources are available. Understanding how others tackled their genealogical puzzles can provide researchers with “road maps” to their own enslaved ancestors, who are waiting to be found. Last but not least, never give up. If you become too easily frustrated and give up, your ancestors will remain buried.

Sunday, August 2, 2015

The Reuniting of Two Sisters, Beady and Brittie Ann


I have come to realize that we are on the ancestors’ time. Therefore, when we embark on a genealogy journey to trace our family histories, we must have patience. We also must never give up. Everything that we want to know will not be found within the time frame that we imagine. If we get easily frustrated and decide that we don’t want to be bothered with genealogy research anymore, then whatever was meant to be found will remain buried. I truly believe that our ancestors want their stories told. At the same time, I feel that they ascertain the perfect time when to drop a major clue out of the blue.

I moved to the Washington, D.C. area in April 2013. Now, I honestly believe that my ancestors were waiting for that move to happen. They had a lot of things in store for me, and being in the D.C. area would be perfect. I needed to be here to also attend the 2015 Earley-Jenkins Family Reunion in Alexandria, Virginia. On the day I moved to the D.C. area, hearing “The Earley-Jenkins Family Reunion” would have meant nothing to me. I was clueless about my connection to this North Carolina family. Two months later, on June 18, 2013, the ancestors obviously stated, “It’s time!” A major clue was revealed. That major clue enabled me to break down one of my brick walls and learn more about my father’s great-grandfather John “Jack” Bass’ family, especially the plight of Jack’s mother, Beady Bass. Previous blog posts disclose the Bass discoveries in greater detail.

However, allow me to summarize in a nutshell. In or around 1849, my great-great-great-grandmother Beady Bass, her children, two brothers, their mother Rose, and possibly her very elderly grandmother Peggy were taken to Hinds County, Mississippi. Persistent research finally revealed that she had a younger sister named Brittie Ann Bass. Aunt Brittie Ann remained in North Carolina because their former enslaver, Council Bass, had bequeathed her in 1830 to one of his three married daughters named Charlotte Holloman; she stayed in North Carolina with her husband, while her two sisters migrated to Hinds County, Mississippi and Madison County, Tennessee with their husbands. Those sisters took nearly all of Aunt Brittie Ann’s siblings away from North Carolina. Sadly, Grandma Beady and Aunt Brittie Ann never saw each other anymore. She subsequently “jumped the broom” with a man named Langley Earley, and they had a large family who lived near Ahoskie in Hertford County, North Carolina after slavery. Aunt Brittie Ann died in 1914. Her death certificate reported that she was “about 100,” and she was definitely in her mid to late 90s when she died.

Shortly after discovering the whereabouts of Aunt Brittie Ann, I was fortunate to find a family tree on that contained one of her sons, Goodman Earley, the same son who was the informant of her 1914 death certificate. Andre Early of New York had uploaded his family tree there. Goodman was Andre’s great-grandfather, and Aunt Brittie Ann was his great-great-grandmother. Soon after making contact with Andre, he invited me to the Earley-Jenkins Family Reunion, a reunion of Aunt Brittie Ann’s descendants! He was the 2015 reunion organizer, and it was slated to be held right here in the D.C. area, practically in my back yard, in Alexandria, Virginia.  

On this past Saturday, while I gazed into the eyes of Aunt Brittie Ann’s descendants, I was in disbelief. All of this happened within a short time frame – from uncovering Grandma Beady Bass’ family and her permanent separation from family members in 2013, to meeting the descendants of one of her long lost sisters in person in 2015! The ancestors were with me as I relayed this unknown history to the family. Mouths dropped while I gave my presentation. Everything seemed so surreal. I had purposely refrained from telling family members how I was related when I was asked before my presentation. I simply stated, “If I tell you now, it may be hard for you to believe, so let’s wait until I give my presentation.” Many understood why I stated that. They never imagined that my connection to the family would be in this manner. I was lovingly embraced, and I felt that North Carolina hospitality. Grandma Beady and Aunt Brittie Ann were happy. They had been reunited.

Here are some pictures from the family reunion:

Andre Early and me

Descendants of Goodman Earley (Brittie Ann’s son)

Descendants of Rev. D. Westley Earley (Brittie Ann’s son)

Naomi Murrell-Bunch of Ahoskie, N.C. delivering the Earley-Jenkins Family Reunion History. She is a great-granddaughter of Aunt Brittie Ann’s son, Rev. D. Westley Earley. Cousin Naomi told me that her grandmother talked about Brittie Ann a lot!

Cousin Naomi Murrell-Bunch

Earley-Jenkins Descendants

Look at that beautiful cake!

With Alice Medford, another descendant of Rev. D. Westley Earley

The Earley-Jenkins Family knows how to dance!

With Cousin Dana Early-Jeune, who wrote on her Facebook page, “Connecting the dots w/ a family member. Sisters separated because of slavery & never knew what happened to each other once the slave owner died & left slaves to his kids. One went to Mississippi & the other one stayed in NC. WOW!!”

Monday, July 13, 2015

Repairing Broken Ties: DNA Finds Aunt Barsilla

My “new” cousin, Nettie Gloster (Courtesy of Nettie Gloster)

Earlier this year, I decided to investigate a predicted 4th cousin DNA match in my AncestryDNA account.  I match Nettie Gloster of Maryland, as well as her mother Ruth. Thankfully, Cousin Nettie’s family tree is viewable to the public. On her family tree I noticed that most of her mother’s ancestors were from Maryland. I have not found any ties to Maryland in my family history to date. However, Cousin Nettie’s maternal grandfather, Albert Cartwright, was born in North Carolina in 1894. Therefore, I decided to investigate his lineage since I had ancestors who were from North Carolina.   

From census records and online marriage data on, I determined that Albert's parents, Dempsey & Zilla Ann Cartwright, had moved to Norfolk, Virginia from Bertie County, North Carolina shortly after marrying in 1890. Bertie County is adjacent to Northampton and Hertford County, where some of my father’s enslaved maternal ancestors had resided. Zilla Ann’s maiden name was Williford. In the 1880 census, Zilla Ann was found in her parents' household, Randall & Mary Williford, in Bertie County. Living next door to Randall and Mary in 1870 was Zillie Willerford; her reported age was 40. She was Randall’s mother. When I found the elder Zillie, my mental light bulb started flashing. Could this be Aunt Barsilla?!? I wondered.

Dempsey Cartwright in the 1899 city directory of Norfolk, Virginia
(Source: U.S. City Directories, 1821-1989 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Operations, Inc., 2011.)

Who is Aunt Barsilla? Let me briefly explain. My 3rd-great-grandmother Beady Bass was first enslaved by Council Bass before he died in 1830 in Northampton County, North Carolina. In his will, he divided his slaves among his three daughters and two granddaughters. Those enslaved people included Grandma Beady, her mother Rose, a number of siblings, and even Grandma Rose’s mother Peggy.  Council Bass bequeathed “two negro girls” named Barsilla and Brittiana to his daughter, Charlotte Holloman. She resided in Hertford County, N.C. with her husband James Holloman. Brittie Ann/Brittiana was found after slavery, and her 1914 death certificate confirmed that she was also a daughter of Grandma Rose. Read about that huge discovery in Many Family Trees Are Wrong as Two Left Shoes.” I speculated that Barsilla was also another daughter.

“Item 5th: I give and bequeath unto Charlotte Holloman my daughter two negroe girls named Barsilla and Brittania to her and her heirs forever.” (Council Bass’ will dated Sept. 2, 1830, Northampton County, N.C.) (Source)

Council’s daughter, Charlotte Holloman, was the only one of his three daughters to remain in North Carolina. His daughter, Martha Bass Mayo, and her husband Frederick Mayo took Grandma Rose’s daughter, Jemima, and her children to Madison County, Tennessee shortly after 1830. His daughter, Elizabeth (Bass) Bass, eventually had Grandma Rose, Grandma Beady and her children, and two of Grandma Rose’s sons, Harry and Jackson, transported to Hinds County, Mississippi around 1849. They had been held in North Carolina by a legal trust set forth by Council’s will. Read more about that in Four Generations of Enslaved Ancestors Held By One Trust.” Therefore, one can plausibly assert that Aunt Barsilla would have also been left back in N.C., too. Also, doesn't the name “Barsilla” sound like “Barzilla”? Wouldn't Zillie be a short version of Barzilla? My theory was that Zillie Williford may have been Aunt Barsilla. How was I going to prove or disprove it?

Well, DNA came to the rescue! No other clues could be found online on, such as a marriage record giving her maiden name or even a death certificate for her. Luckily, the following DNA events occurred so smoothly in the following chronological order within the past 4 months that allowed me to answer the question.

(1)   Cousin Nettie took my advice and uploaded her and her mother’s AncestryDNA raw data files to GEDmatch. I was then able to confirm that they are a DNA match to my father. They did not match any of my father’s paternal cousins on GEDmatch. So far, so good! (See this blog post on clear instructions on how to upload to GEDmatch.)

(2)   Several weeks later, I obtained a brand new predicted third cousin match in AncestryDNA named Mary. Luckily, she is on my father’s biological mother’s side! My father’s maternal grandmother, Angeline Bass, and Cousin Mary’s great-grandmother, Maria Bass, were sisters – the daughters of Jack & Frances Bass. She is my father’s second cousin once removed and my third cousin. Our Grandpa Jack Bass was the son of Grandma Beady. Now, I had a known relative on my father’s mother’s side with whom I can compare with Cousin Nettie’s mother Ruth, if she uploads to GEDmatch.

(3)   Thankfully, Cousin Mary also took my advice and uploaded her AncestryDNA raw data file to GEDmatch. She and my father share 180.8 cM over 8 segments. Using the one-to-one comparison feature in GEDmatch, I compared her and Cousin Ruth. They match! They share just only 7.3 cM (2,010 SNPs). Cousin Mary also matches our cousin, Janice, whose 3rd-great-grandmother was Jemima Mayo. Aunt Jemima was Grandma Beady’s sister and another daughter of Grandma Rose. Janice and Mary share 15.3 cM of DNA.

(4)   Then, using the chromosome browser feature in GEDmatch, I “triangulated” Cousin Mary with my father, me, Cousin Nettie, and Cousin Janice. With DNA triangulation, one has to ensure that all people being compared are related to each other. See this post to learn more about DNA triangulation. Cousin Janice does not match Ruth. However, comparing everyone revealed something interesting!

Triangulating Cousin Mary with my father, me, Nettie’s mother Ruth, and Janice

Those long chromosome segments in yellow on our chromosome 18, measuring 45 cM, is what my father, Cousin Mary, and I inherited from our common ancestor, Grandpa Jack Bass. He inherited it from his mother, Grandma Beady Bass, which came from one of her parents, Seneca or Rose Bass. To explain it another way, Seneca or Rose is the source of that long chromosome segment in yellow on our chromosome 18 that my father, Mary, and I inherited. How do I know this? Because we match Cousin Janice on one end of that segment at 15 cM, and she is also a descendant of Seneca and Rose Bass (See green line). I smiled when I noticed that Cousin Ruth matches Mary, Dad, and me on the other end (See blue line). This is called "overlapping segments". Therefore, Cousin Ruth is indeed related to us via Seneca and/or Rose! This is DNA proof that Aunt Barsilla from Council Bass’ 1830 will was very likely Cousin Ruth’s great-great-grandmother, Zillie Williford!

However, more proof was found! I learned that Charlotte Bass Holloman’s husband James Holloman died in 1855 in Hertford County, N.C. I searched for his will or estate record, and I found his will, which was written on April 11, 1855. I wanted to see if I can find both Barsilla and Brittie Ann, whom his wife inherited in 1830 from Council Bass. He only mentioned four slaves in his will, who were called “Negro boys.” One of them was named Randall! Randall and another boy named Basil were bequeathed to daughter, Lavina Holloman, who had married her relative, Joseph Holloman. In the 1870 census, Joseph & Lavina Holloman were enumerated in the same district as Zillie Williford in Bertie County. Proximity is always great additional evidence!  

“. . . In the first place I give to my daughter Lavina Holloman wife of Joseph Holloman two negro boys one by the name of Randal and the other Basil to her and her heirs forever.” (James Holloman’s will dated Apr. 11, 1855, Hertford County, N.C.) (Source)

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Who’s the Daddy? (Part 2)

Last Wednesday, I posted “My ‘Maury Povich’ Moment with DNA.”  You have to read it to understand this update. In a nutshell, after 21 years, with clues from oral history and genealogy research staring me in the face all that time, DNA is confirming that a man named Prince Edwards (born c. 1830) of Panola County, Mississippi was likely the father of my mother’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Partee Reed (1852-1923) of Tate County (Senatobia), Mississippi. Then, my cousin, Dr. Jeffrey O. Green Ogbar, sent me turning flips with excitement because of the African history he had uncovered about the Edwards Family. Details are in “My ‘Maury Povich’ Moment with DNA.”

Hooked up with cousin Dr. Jeffrey O. Green Ogbar this past Saturday to rap about our 3rd-great-grandfather, Ogba(r) Ogumba (Luke Edwards Sr.) and future research and DNA verification plans.

Last night, I was able to finally talk with one of my close DNA matches, who had been in my Mom’s relative database in 23andMe for over 2 years. Andre shares 70 cM (0.94%) across 4 segments with Mom, 81 cM (1.09%) across 5 segments with my uncle, and 93 cM (1.26%) across 6 segments with my aunt, with a predicted relationship of 2nd to 3rd cousin. After talking with Andre and his father Albert last night, I see why Andre shares a lot of DNA with us. Albert’s real paternal grandfather's father was Uncle Square Partee, one of Grandma Sarah’s brothers! Therefore, Andre and my Mom are second cousins twice removed.

When I discovered that Prince Edwards was Grandma Sarah’s father, I wondered if he was the father of her three younger brothers, Judge Partee (1854), Square Partee (1858), and Johnny Partee (1864). There may have been another brother, Dock Partee (born c. 1855), but his relationship is presently unconfirmed. They were all the children of Polly Partee, who was known as being the cook on Squire B. Partee’s plantation in Panola County, Mississippi during and after slavery. She was born somewhere in North Carolina around 1832. Again, DNA is coming to the rescue to provide a partial answer to my question – was Prince Edwards also the father of Grandma Sarah’s younger brothers?

One of the close DNA matches in 23andMe that confirmed my family’s connection to Prince Edwards was Elmer Edwards of Alberta, Canada. Both he and his daughter Sandra took the 23andMe test. After Sandra accepted my sharing invitation in 23andMe, I was able to see her father’s profile and compare him to my Mom and her siblings. Elmer was the great-grandson of Peter Edwards (born c. 1835), who was one of Prince’s brothers who left Mississippi and settled in Oklahoma. Elmer’s father, Jefferson Edwards, left Oklahoma in 1911 and migrated to Alberta, Canada. More details are in “My ‘Maury Povich’ Moment with DNA.”

Well, Andre is also a DNA match to Elmer! In fact, they all share DNA on chromosome 16 on overlapping segments, which means that they all share a common ancestor(s). This DNA match is strongly indicating that Prince Edwards was also the father of Uncle Square Partee. To add to this claim, Andre and Elmer have the same paternal haplogroup, E1b1a7a. Paternal haplogroups are Y-chromosome haplogroups, and Y-chromosomes are passed down in tact from father to son for many generations. Therefore, two men, whose fathers were brothers (born to the same father), will have the exact same paternal haplogroup. This was the paternal haplogroup of Luke Edwards, Sr. (aka Ogba[r] Ogumba / Agba Akumba), the proposed father of Luke Jr., Peter, Prince, Jeffrey/Jefferson/Jeff, Jerry, Monroe, Jack, and York Edwards.

One of the matching segments is on their chromosome 16, where they all match in the same location.

I mentioned an unconfirmed brother named Dock Partee. Well, Dock moved to DeSoto County, Mississippi after 1880. I had found him in the 1900 census. Check this out. Someone named John Edwards was living in his household. I ignored this the first time I saw it, but now it is of great significance. John was 25 years old. The relationship was not given but rather John was reported as being a “servant”. Hmmmm…….

Dock’s age was reported as 27 in 1880. Then, in 1900, his age was reported as 55. I guesstimate that he was born around 1855. Interestingly, he also named a daughter Hattie.
 Source Citation: Year: 1900; Census Place: Beat 4, De Soto, Mississippi; Roll: 807; Page: 20A; Enumeration District: 0028; FHL microfilm: 1240807

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

My “Maury Povich Moment” with DNA

Three of 11 children of Bill & Sarah Partee Reed: Jimmy, John Ella, and Pleas Reed
Tate County, Mississippi

To date, June 2015 will go down in genealogy history as the month that I had the most discoveries, all within 30 days. I won’t go into details about all of them in this blog post. However, I will reveal my first one, which has still left me in utter shock. Not only that, this discovery has led to other mouth-dropping discoveries that I will present. Therefore, in an effort not to write an extremely long blog post and for better flow of information, I will present this discovery in four parts. Part 1 is what led to it all.

Part 1: Who’s the Daddy?

The father of my mother’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Partee Reed (1852-1923), has been a mystery for me for over 20 years! For years, I speculated that a man named James Partee, born c. 1825 in Virginia, may have been her father, although Grandma Sarah (or someone) reported to the census-takers that her father was born in Tennessee. I even wrote this August 30, 2013 blog post about my speculation of James Partee. In my mind, I had always pictured that her father was another person enslaved on Squire B. Partee’s plantation near Como, Mississippi. I was wrong as two left shoes!

Little did I know, family elders provided great clues all along, but I failed to see the answer. Let me briefly take you back to July 1994, the day I met the late Cousin Isaac “Ike” Deberry Sr., my mother’s eldest paternal first cousin, at the Reed & Puryear Family Reunion in Senatobia, Mississippi. At the time, he was 80 years old, and I was a college youngster deeply interested in my family roots. Cousin Ike was practically raised by his maternal grandparents, Bill & Sarah Reed. That day, during my conversation with him, he claimed that Grandpa Bill Reed (1846-1937) had two sisters named Louvenia Hunter and Hattie Whiting who came with him to Mississippi from South Carolina right after slavery. I soon learned that Grandpa Bill arrived in northern Mississippi from Abbeville, South Carolina in 1866. I was very excited because I now had more clues to take my research further.

During my next trip to the Mississippi Department of Archives & History in Jackson, I searched for those alleged sisters in the census records. My findings didn’t completely jive with what Cousin Isaac Deberry had told me initially. He was partially correct, which is the nature of oral history. In a nutshell, I realized that Louvenia Hunter was Grandpa Bill Reed's niece, his sister's daughter, and not his sister. Prior to marrying Allen Hunter, Louvenia was in the household of her parents, Dave & Mary Pratt, who were both from South Carolina. My Mom remembers the Hunters (Louvenia's children) as being her cousins. So the dots connected with Louvenia.

But what about Aunt Hattie Whiting? When I found Aunt Hattie in the censuses and marriage records, I became even more confused! I discovered that her maiden name was Edwards and that she was born in 1866 in Mississippi. I found her in her parents' household in 1880, before she married Sam Whiting in 1885. Her parents were Prince & Leanna Edwards. No one was from South Carolina. If someone is to be Grandpa Bill's sister, she had to have been born in South Carolina, too.

To make things even more confusing, other family elders corroborated what Cousin Ike said. One family elder recalled that Sam & Hattie Edwards Whiting's two children, Admira & Prince Whiting, were first cousins to my grandfather Simpson Reed and his siblings. What? How could that be? It could not be on Grandpa Bill's side. Hattie's siblings, Jeff, Bly, and Miles Edwards, were also considered to be "close family," according to Cousin Ike. So I began to speculate that the connection was truly on Grandma Sarah's side. Aunt Hattie's mother, Leanna Edwards, was born in Maryland, according to the 1880 census. No one in my family came from Maryland. North Carolina was consistently reported as the birthplace of Grandma Sarah's mother, Polly Partee (born c. 1832). So that left Aunt Hattie’s father, Prince Edwards.

In the 1880 Panola County census, Prince Edwards’ age was reported as 40 years old. Grandma Sarah was around 27 or 28 years old then. What is the connection? I wondered this for over 20 years. It didn’t dawn on me then that perhaps Prince Edwards may have been closer to 50, rather than 40. A rule in genealogy, especially African-American genealogy, is to never consider the reported ages in the census records as the absolute truth. Many formerly enslaved African Americans did not know their exact birthdates.

Part 2: My “Maury Povich Moment”

Now, let’s fast forward 21 years later, to June 25, 2015. DNA technology has entered the scene, and millions of people have utilized DNA technology via 23andMe, Family Tree DNA, AncestryDNA, and other DNA companies to tell them something about their ancestry. One of those persons is Kemberly Edwards-Morris, Ph.D of Atlanta. Her family is from Oklahoma. She is a new DNA match in my mother, aunt, and uncle’s GEDmatch databases. My uncle John Reed is presently her highest DNA match, at 87.1 cM across 4 segments (76.3 cM when performing an one-to-one comparison), with an estimated MRCA (Most Recent Common Ancestor) of 3.7 generations back. Not only that, their paternal first cousin’s granddaughter Caronde Puryear is Kemberly’s third highest DNA match in GEDmatch, sharing 59.5 cM across 3 segments. Therefore, our connection to Kemberly is via my grandfather, Simpson Reed.

I sent an e-mail to Kemberly introducing myself. I also explained that she is related to my maternal grandfather. She responded excitingly within an hour and included a link to her family tree on In her response, she explained that her only link to Mississippi was via her paternal Edwards family, who left Panola County, Mississippi and eventually migrated to Oklahoma. My heart started pounding! Then, I clicked on her family tree. My heart skipped a beat when I noticed that her great-great-great-grandfather was Peter Edwards!

Why is Peter Edwards so important?  In the 1870 census, Prince Edwards' two oldest children, Harriett and Prince Jr., were in Peter's household. Perhaps Peter and his wife were babysitting when the census-taker came by in 1870, and the census-taker recorded them in Peter's household. In 1880, Harriet and Prince Jr. were in the household of their parents, Prince & Leanna Edwards, as well as other younger siblings. Harriet was Aunt Hattie Edwards Whiting. Prince and Peter appeared to have been brothers. Then, as I thought about it more and re-analyzed everything, a light bulb went off. In my mind I heard Maury Povich’s voice saying, “In the case of baby Sarah Partee, Prince Edwards, DNA says that you ARE the father!” lol Everything began to make sense after 20 years! Hattie and Grandma Sarah were half-sisters! That’s why Cousin Ike had claimed her as a “sister,” but he was apparently confused about whose sister she was. So indeed, Hattie’s children, Admira & Prince Whiting, would have been my grandfather’s first cousins, like the elders had claimed. They were right all along!

Part 3: Cousins Everywhere, Even in Alberta, Canada!

My excited newfound cousin Kemberly further communicated more about the history of her Edwards Family branch. Peter Edwards, his second wife Catherine, and his 12 children (Isaac, Patrick, John, Jeff, Peter, Katie, Henry, Lucy, Jerry, Paul, Silas, and Moses) left the Como and Sardis area of Panola County after 1880 and spent some time in Quitman County, in the Mississippi Delta, near the towns of Sledge and Maston. Even Uncle Prince Edwards, Jr. followed them to Quitman County, where I found him in the 1900 census with his wife and children.  Around 1907, scores of Edwards then left Mississippi and settled in Lincoln County, Oklahoma, in the communities of Wellston, Wewoka, and Lima. Cousin Kemberly further shared that the Edwards Family Reunion, which is held every two years, generates an attendance of 200-500 people! They are preparing for their 2015 reunion in Chicago this month. This is their website:

Kemberly also relayed that there are a lot of black Edwards in Alberta, Canada. I then discovered through Internet sites that Peter’s grandson, Jefferson Edwards, spurned a migration of about 200 African Americans from Lincoln County, Oklahoma to an area outside of Edmonton, Canada in 1910-1911. From Edmonton, Jefferson walked a hundred miles north and staked a homestead east of Athabasca (source). He soon married his sweetheart, Martha Murphy, and the couple were two of the first settlers in the black settlement known as "Amber Valley". He was only 21 years old. They had settled in Amber Valley because Oklahoma Black farmers had been denied the same rights as others. They found the laws in Oklahoma to be more restrictive regarding Black rights (source)

This was another mental "light bulb flashing” moment because the following new DNA match from Canada appeared in my Mom, aunt, and uncle’s relative database in 23andMe over a month ago! She lists Edwards as one of her surnames! She shares the most DNA with my aunt at 62 cM (0.83%) across 2 segments, with a predicted relationship of 3rd cousins. That’s fairly close kin, in my opinion!

Is Sandra a descendant of Jefferson Edwards? Presently, that question remains unanswered, as I wait for her to respond to my message. Based on my and others’ experiences, the wait could be days, months, unfortunately several years, or never. Hopefully, she will eventually respond. Nonetheless, I learned that Jefferson and Martha had 10 children, seven boys and three girls. He died in 1979, at the age of 90. He is remembered as a proud Canadian citizen who exemplified the strong spirit of the Black pioneers who settled the Canadian West. More about the Alberta, Canada Edwards Family can be read in this Alberta Council on Aging newsletter, ACA News Winter 2014.

Update (7/2/15): Sandra saw this post and confirmed that Jefferson Edwards is her paternal grandfather! Yeah! Her father also took the 23andMe test and shares 89 cM (1.20%) across 4 segments!

Part 4: Is Ogba(r) my “Kunte Kinte”??

Another reason why all of this is so shocking for me is because I have been aware of the Edwards Family of Panola County for a long time. My maternal grandmother’s oldest sister, Mae Ella Davis (1899-1975), married Johnny Edwards; they and their children left Como, Mississippi and moved to Benton Harbor, Michigan. Mom and her siblings have fond memories of visiting Uncle Johnny & Aunt Mae Ella Edwards. Uncle Johnny’s paternal grandfather, Jerry Edwards, is believed to be a brother to Prince and Peter Edwards!

In 2011, I learned a lot about the Edwards Family History from my cousin, Dr. Jeffrey O. Green Ogbar, never knowing until now that this is my family, too. Cousin Jeffrey explained to me why he changed his surname to Ogbar. You see, he had started researching the Edwards Family History some years ago. He was very fortunate to gain some invaluable oral history notes from his great-uncle, who had interviewed elderly relatives back in the 1970s. According to those elders, the father of Jeffrey’s great-great-grandfather Jerry Edwards was an African who was given the name Luke. He told his family that his real name was Ogba(r) Ogumba (or Agba Akumba). Cousin Jeffrey changed his surname to reflect his African roots. According to Cousin Jeffrey, geneticist Dr. Rick Kittles' analysis linked a male Edwards' Y-DNA to the Akan people of Ghana. The oral history also posits that the slave-owner, William Edwards Sr., purchased Luke off a slave ship in Virginia and transported him to Mississippi. Census records show that they were in Tennessee for at least two decades before coming to Panola County, Mississippi around 1837. Also, according to the oral history that Cousin Jeffrey was able to garner, Luke's wife was named Reedia (or Rita), with whom he had at least six sons.

We are trying to figure out who all of those sons were. Naming patterns strongly suggest that there may have been at least 8 sons: Jerry, Peter, Prince, York, Monroe, Jeffrey/Jeff/Jefferson, Jack, and Luke. Panola County census records show that there was indeed someone named Luke Edwards living in the vicinity up until after 1900. He was born around 1815/1817 in Tennessee. My theory is that this Luke was probably Luke Junior. The 1850 Panola County slave schedule shows that William Edwards’ oldest male slave in 1850 was a 60-year-old black male (born c. 1790). Of course, his age was estimated. We wonder if this elder male was Luke Senior [a.k.a. Ogba(r) Ogumba]? Is he truly my great-great-great-grandfather?!? I believe so! However, we have so much to figure out! Documents to prove our theories are currently being sought. Also, I think that further DNA testing will help solve the case as well. Nonetheless, all of this has been overwhelming but in a great way!

Last week, I was able to confirm that William Edwards Sr. was indeed the slave-owner. He died on Oct. 2, 1855, in Panola County, at the age of 75. Interestingly, his plantation wasn’t far from Squire B. Partee’s plantation, and he and Squire Partee are both buried at Fredonia Church Cemetery, eight miles east of Como. I was fortunate to find his estate file on, and the names of those 8 Edwards men were inventoried, including my Prince! Yes, it was another “Carlton Banks” dance moment for me. lol

The Slave Inventory of William Edwards’ Estate
December 15, 1855, Panola County, Mississippi (Source)

William Edwards’ gravestone at Fredonia Church Cemetery, Panola County, Mississippi
(Source: Find A Grave)

Me and Cousin Dr. Jeffrey O. Green Ogbar; Taken at the Tupac Amaru Shakur Collection Conference
Robert W. Woodruff Library – Atlanta University Center, Sept. 2012

UPDATE: Also, check out “Who’s the Daddy? (Part 2)” posted on July 7, 2015.