This revised research article, originally entitled "Playing the Name Game: African-American Genealogical Research In Motion,"
was written on 2/27/2011. I have transferred it to my blog.
My
great-great-grandparents
Hector Davis (1842-1925) & Lucy Milam Davis (1846-1927)
Panola County (Como),
Mississippi
Introduction
When Africans were forcibly taken from Africa and transported to the Americas, their freedom was
not only eradicated, but they were systematically stripped of their African
heritages. English colonies developed a series of laws to define chattel
slavery in America, which included the outlawing of African religious rituals,
the banning of the use of drums, and the barring of African languages. The
children of Africa entered the New World with names that represented their
family heritage in their homeland. However, the vast majority of those names were replaced with
European names forced upon them by slave traders. Only a very small percentage of enslaved Africans were able to retain African names. The enforcement of the use
of those European names was depicted in the 1977-movie, Roots. In a tearful scene, Kunte Kinte was brutally whipped for
refusing to take his given name, Toby. As Africans acclimated to the abhorrent
life situations that were forced upon them by American chattel slavery, they and the
successive generations began to establish their identity in the New World by
adopting surnames, especially after the Civil War.
One of the most common and often erroneous
presumptions is that when enslaved African Americans were emancipated during
and after the Civil War, a vast majority retained the surnames of their last
enslavers. Many freed African Americans not only chose different surnames after
slavery, but many had surnames on farms and plantations that were concealed
from most slave-owners. In The
Black Family in Slavery and Freedom, 1750-1925, historian Herbert Gutman quoted the
following from the 1865 diary of Eliza Frances Andrews, a slave-owner’s
daughter in Georgia:
“I notice that the negroes seldom or never
take the names of the present owners in adopting their ‘entitles’ as they call
their own surnames, but always that of some former master, and they go back as
far as possible.” (pg. 256)
I researched the slave narratives of
Mississippi to test Eliza Andrews' observation. My research findings appear to
corroborate her claim to a degree.
Eighty-one African-American men from Mississippi were interviewed with
only two of the interviewees not disclosing the name of their last enslaver. Of
the 79 men who disclosed their last enslavers’ full or last names, 57% of them
did not take their surnames. These are
the results of my findings:
MISSISSIPPI
Surname Pattern Number Percentage
Same surname as last enslaver
35 43%
Different surname from last enslaver 44 57%
Total number of interviews 79
In a similar study, Gutman investigated the slave narratives for the states of South Carolina and
Texas. He found from those narratives that former slaves from those two
states or their parents had often either retained or chosen surnames different
from their last enslavers’. From the interviews of 181 African Americans in
South Carolina, nearly three out of four had different surnames. In Texas, two
out of three African Americans who were interviewed chose different
surnames. These were Gutman's results:
SOUTH
CAROLINA
Surname Pattern Number Percentage
Same surname as last enslaver
49 27%
Different surname from last enslaver 132 73%
Total number of interviews 181
TEXAS
Surname Pattern Number Percentage
Same surname as last enslaver
74 34%
Different surname from last enslaver 143 66%
Total number of interviews 217
Taking A Different Surname
In my research over the years, I found
that a number of my ancestors did not retain their last slave-owners'
surnames. Here's how I stumbled on that
fact for one of my ancestors, Hector
Davis.
I've spent a lot of days at the
Mississippi Department of Archives & History (MDAH) in Jackson turning
miles of microfilm. The night before one of those visits, I listed several
things I wanted to research. After spending several hours at the MDAH the
next morning, I had completed my research list. Some information I was able to
find and some I didn't. However, before I got up to head home to enjoy the rest
of the day, another "nudge" from the ancestors coerced me to stay put
and take a look at the DeSoto County, Mississippi marriage records of the early
Black marriages (1866-188?). I'd
researched that microfilm several months before in search of a marriage record
for my great-great-grandparents, Hector & Lucy Davis. The 1900 Panola
County, Mississippi census reports that they had been married 34 years that year, so
I was hoping to locate their marriage certificate. Unfortunately, I couldn't.
Although this was not on my research
agenda, I retrieved the microfilm again, placed it on the microfilm reader, and
started to browse through the marriage records again. This time, I noticed that
I had missed the bride's index. Before, I had only browsed the groom's index
without any success and didn't notice that there was a bride's index. Well,
minutes later, I came upon a name - Lucy Milam. I knew my
great-great-grandmother's maiden name was Milam, so I quickly got excited. I
then turned to the page the marriage certificate was on and found the
following: Hector BURNETT to Lucy Milam, July 3, 1866.
I became elated and bewildered at the same
time. I said to myself, "His name
is Hector Davis not Hector Burnett! Where in the world did this Burnett name
come from? Somebody made a huge mistake!" I sat there for a while staring
at the marriage certificate, wondering why Grandpa Hector's name had been
recorded as Burnett. Amazingly, the next certificate was of Huldah Burnett (Hector's sister)
marrying Spencer Milam (Lucy's cousin,
I believe). The two Burnett/Milam couples had married on the same day.
Interesting!
After finding those marriage records, I
just couldn't leave there without taking a look at the 1870 & 1880 DeSoto
(Tate) and Panola County censuses again to see if I could find any persons with
the last name Burnett, a name I had never heard of in my family history from my
family elders. I had to research both
counties because my ancestors lived less than a mile from the Tate-Panola
County line. Tate County was part of DeSoto County prior to 1873. To my surprise, I found
Grandpa Hector's brother, Jack Davis Jr., in the 1870 DeSoto County census, and
his name was reported as Jack Burnett! See image:
I could never find Uncle Jack prior to
1880 because I had been looking for a "Jack Davis." By 1870, Grandpa Hector and their parents,
Jack Sr. & Flora, had already changed their names to Davis, but Uncle Jack
was still reported as Burnett. However,
by the time the 1880 census was taken, all of the family had changed over to
Davis. When I found Uncle Jack and his family in the 1870 census, guess who
lived near him?
You guessed it - a white Burnett. An elderly lady named Anna Burnett, age 74, was in the same area in 1870. Just like Grandpa Hector Davis, his parents,
and his siblings, Anna Burnett had also come from South Carolina.
Hmmmm.... I wasn't going to leave the
MDAH until I started researching for the answers to following questions:
(1)
Who was Anna Burnett's husband and when did he die?
(2)
Were they indeed the last enslavers of Grandpa Hector, his parents, and
siblings?
(3)
Where in South Carolina did they come from? Census analysis revealed that my
Davis ancestors arrived in northern Mississippi from South Carolina around
1861, probably shortly before the Civil War began. Did the Burnetts bring them
to Mississippi?
(4)
Why did my ancestors change their surname to Davis?
Tackling the Questions
(1) Who was Anna
Burnett's husband and when did he die?
I found a book at the MDAH entitled
Cemeteries of Panola County, Mississippi, published by the Panola Historical
Society in 1994. Their members had
visited numerous cemeteries throughout Panola County, transcribed names and
dates from tombstones, and published this information in a book. God bless them! In it, I found the following:
BURNETT, John
1/7/1795 - 10/23/1862
BURNETTE, Anna, wife
of John, 11/7/1797 - 9/7/1878
(Special notation:
Anna's stone has an "e", John does not.)
(2) Were John &
Anna Burnett the last enslavers of Grandpa Hector Davis and his family?
Thankfully, John Burnett had died in 1862
- before slavery had ended in 1865. He
had died around a year after they migrated to Mississippi. Therefore, if there's a will and/or
probate records for him, it may include the names of any slaves he had
owned since slaves were considered property -- very valuable property. Instead of going to work one Wednesday
morning, I decided to drive down to Hernando, Mississippi to the DeSoto County
courthouse to search for Burnett's will and estate records, which was just a 30-minute drive from where I lived in Memphis. The courthouse worker led me to a room
filled with file cabinets that contain estate dockets. Within a few minutes, I was happy to see that
there was one for John Burnett. I carefully
opened his estate docket and browsed through the fragile documents within
it. My heart started pounding when I
held two old blue/greenish pieces of paper, held together by a rusty stickpin
that was probably over 130 years old, and realized that it was the following
slave inventory dated March 20, 1863:
1
Negro man named Jack $700
1 "
" " George
$1400
1 "
" " Young
Jack $1400
1
" " " HECTOR
$1200
1
" " " Cato
$1300
1
Negro girl Nancy $1100
1
old Negro woman Flora $400
1
girl Julia $1100
1
boy Wesley $700
1
boy Jim $800
1
boy Lewis $700
1
girl little Nelly & old Nelly $800
1
boy Bob $1200
I was so overwhelmed that I just had to
sit there still for a moment to digest the document that I was viewing. It was the
first time I found a slave inventory with my direct ancestors' names on it. I was amazed as well as sad. The amazement
came from the fact that I had documented my Davis ancestors during the slavery
era, but the sadness came from when I saw how my enslaved ancestors were listed
in that inventory among horses, cows, household items, and etc. with a price
value beside their names.
(3) Where in South
Carolina did they come from?
In an oral history interview with my
maternal grandmother's first cousin, the late Sammie Lee Davis Hayes, she
shared with me the following about her grandfather Hector's history, "I remember Grandpa Hector telling us
how they were brought to Mississippi in wagons from South Carolina." Cousin Sammie Lee was accurate. Census
records verified that claim. She further
relayed, "I remember Uncle Jack (her
great-uncle) well, and he and Grandpa Hector had a first cousin named Cut'n
Wesley Johnson, who was also brought to Mississippi with them from South
Carolina. Cut'n Wesley and Grandpa
Hector were real close like brothers."
Undoubtedly, Cousin Wesley Johnson was "boy Wesley" on the
slave inventory. Like my Davis
ancestors, Cousin Wesley also took a different surname after slavery --
Johnson. Where in South Carolina did they
come from?
To try to find the answer to that
important question, I viewed the 1850 South Carolina census index. There were
five John Burnetts living in different counties in South Carolina. Luckily, I
found John & Anna Burnett residing in the Saluda district of Abbeville
County, South Carolina. I then checked the 1850 Abbeville County slave schedule
and found John Burnett with 18 slaves.
Slave schedules only report the names of slave-owners and the age, sex,
and color of each of their slaves.
Looking more closely at the schedule of
John Burnett’s slaves in 1850, I noticed the unique way the census enumerator
listed them in the slave schedule. An adult female was listed first with eight
much younger slaves (children) listed after her. She was my great-great-great-grandmother,
Flora Davis. A second adult female slave, likely Nelly, was listed next with
eight much younger slaves (children) listed after her. John Burnett obviously
had owned two adult females and their 16 children, collectively. Since there was not an adult male slave,
Flora's husband, my great-great-great-grandfather Jack Davis Sr., was not
enslaved by John Burnett in 1850. Where was he?
Hmmmm......
(4) Why did they
change their surname to Davis?
In the 1850 Abbeville County census, I
discovered something that really caught my eye. There was a Davis family living
in the same neighborhood as the Burnetts.
The family was headed by a man named Ephraim Davis. I checked the 1850
Abbeville County slave schedule to see if Ephraim Davis had owned any slaves.
He had five slaves; one was a 35-year-old male which matched the profile of
Jack Sr. More questions entered my mind.
Did Ephraim Davis “own” Jack Sr. in 1850?
Could Ephraim Davis be the person from whom the Davis name came from? More research will be done to uncover this
mystery. If Ephraim Davis was the one,
he undoubtedly sold Jack Sr. to the Burnetts before they migrated to
Mississippi with Flora and her children so that Jack Sr. would not be separated
from his family. After slavery, Jack Sr.
and his family decided to take the Davis surname instead of Burnett.
Conclusion
As the number of
their public transactions increased after 1865, the surnames of many once-enslaved African Americans had to be written into a
record – whether as depositors in one of the Freedmen’s Banks, as signers or
X-markers on a labor contract, as interviewees of the 1870 census enumerator,
or as couples getting married by a county clerk. An in-depth research of these
records, as well as the genealogy research of many African-American families,
will show that many desired to take a surname that differed from their last
enslaver. This revelation dispels the myth that the surname of an
African American most likely represents the surname of the owner whose farm our
ancestors resided on at the time of Emancipation. In registers recording
360 marriages at Davis Bend, Mississippi in 1864-1865, only a few of the
enslaved carried the names Quitman, Jefferson, and Davis, the surnames of the
prominent Davis Bend planters. Many African Americans' desire to detach
themselves from their last enslavers by rejecting their surnames undoubtedly
symbolized the independence that they longed to have for many generations.